Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2019-03-03 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Gold | Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia 9 PureView is just a bit better than the Moto X (2014), getting a 76.4 score against 73.4. Nokia 9 PureView's design is incredibly newer and noticeably thinner, but also heavier than Moto X (2014). Nokia 9 PureView has a bit superior processing unit than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with 4 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Moto X (2014) has a bit better looking screen than Nokia 9 PureView, although it has a bit lower pixels count per screen inch, a way worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller display. Nokia 9 PureView shoots clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has a camera with a worse resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture for better low-light photos and video.
The Nokia 9 PureView features a much greater memory for games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has more internal memory capacity. The Nokia 9 PureView has a much better battery life than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 3320mAh of battery capacity instead of 2300mAh.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto X (2014). If you want to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Moto X (2014), letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.