Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2021-11-09 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.75 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.65 ounces |
| Gold | Midnight Blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4470mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia X100 is a bit better than Moto X (2014), with a 77.3 score against 73.4. Although the Nokia X100 is heavier than the Moto X (2014), it's a bit thinner and also extremely newer. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Nokia X100 has a newer 11 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, providing some nice extra features and improved performance.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) features a more vivid screen than Nokia X100, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a just a bit higher amount of pixels in each inch of screen. The Nokia X100 counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a bit more powerful processor than Nokia X100, because although it has lesser cpu cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor. Nokia X100 has a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 4470mAh of battery capacity.
The Moto X (2014) has a superior camera than Nokia X100, although it has a much less MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.