Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2021-05-01 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.65 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold | Midnight Sun and Nordic Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 2400 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 8.8 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4470mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia X20 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto X (2014), with a 77.2 score against 73.4. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia X20 has a more recent 11 version while Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, offering a couple additional features. The Nokia X20 construction is notably newer and a little bit thinner, but extremely heavier than the Motorola Moto X (2014).
Moto X (2014) counts with a bit superior processor than Nokia X20, because although it has less RAM memory and 4 lesser cores , it also counts with an additional GPU. The Moto X (2014) has a better screen than Nokia X20, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a little greater number of pixels in each display inch.
Moto X (2014) takes clearer pictures and videos than Nokia X20, although it has a camera in the back with much less MP resolution. The Nokia X20 has much more memory for applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB and 96 GB more internal memory.
The Nokia X20 features a much better battery performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 4470mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.