Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-09-04 | -- |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Gold | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a general score of 76.2, which is just a bit better than Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 global score. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has newer 14 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features and performance enhancements. The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G construction is incredibly thinner but much heavier than Moto X (2014).
Moto X (2014) counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a little bit better pixel count in each inch of screen. Galaxy A16 5G has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto X (2014), because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Moto X (2014) has a much powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Galaxy A16 5G features a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2300mAh.
Galaxy A16 5G and Motorola Moto X (2014) both feature similar cameras, although the Galaxy A16 5G also has a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy A16 5G is also by far the cheapest one, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.