Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2021-02-25 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | -- |
| Gold | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only is better than Motorola Moto X (2014), with a general score of 82 against 73.4. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A32 LTE Only has 11 version while Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, so it provides a couple additional features and improved performance. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only body is extremely newer, notably lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto X (2014).
Moto X (2014) has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has 4 less cores (but faster) and 2 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto X (2014), because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 117% larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only captures much better videos and photos than Moto X (2014), because although it has a way smaller sensor offering a way worse image quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited environments and a back camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.