Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has an overall score of 79.4, which is slightly better than the Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 score. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a newer 14 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0. Although Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is extremely heavier than Moto X (2014), it's thinner and a lot newer.
Moto X (2014) features a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has lesser cpu cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a GPU. Moto X (2014) features a little sharper display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen and a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixels density.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much better battery life than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a lot better camera than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a much bigger camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality, a much more mega pixels camera in the back and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.