Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than Motorola Moto X (2014)'s overall score of 73.4. Galaxy A52's body is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Moto X (2014)'s, but it's extremely heavier. The Moto X (2014) features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a much smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit higher number of pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy A52 counts with a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB and 96 GB more internal memory. Moto X (2014) counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A52, because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Moto X (2014), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a very superior camera than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a lot better 64 MP resolution back camera, a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and videos and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.