Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-09-04 | 2016-06-01 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C5 is a bit better than the Moto X (2014), with a 76.4 score against 73.4. The Samsung Galaxy C5 design is newer, a little lighter and extremely thinner than Moto X (2014). Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy C5 has 6.0 Marshmallow version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, providing the user a couple additional features.
Moto X (2014) has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has a lower number of cores and 2 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Moto X (2014) counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy C5. Both have a screen with the same size, the same exact 1920 x 1080px resolution and the same number of pixels in each inch of display.
The Galaxy C5 counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. Motorola Moto X (2014) shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy C5, because although it has a lower 13 MP resolution back camera and a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality.
Galaxy C5 has just a little better battery lifetime than Moto X (2014), because it has a 2600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.