Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2021-03-18 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Gold | Black, blue and white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | PLS |
| 424 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M12 is a little bit better than the Moto X (2014), having a overall score of 80 against 73.4. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M12 has the newer 10 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version. Even though Samsung Galaxy M12 is heavier than the Moto X (2014), it's just a bit thinner and also noticeably newer.
Moto X (2014) counts with a way better looking screen than Galaxy M12, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better display pixel density and a higher 1920 x 1080px resolution. The Motorola Moto X (2014) features a bit better processing power than Galaxy M12, because although it has lesser processing cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
Samsung Galaxy M12 features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto X (2014), because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB and more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy M12 features a superior battery duration than Moto X (2014), because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy M12 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M12 also has a bigger aperture and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.