Compare phones
Motorola Moto X
64 GB| Global Score | |
| 70.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2, 4.4, 4.3, 4.2.2 | -- |
| 2013-08-01 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.09 x 2.57 x 0.41 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Green, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Motorola X8 (Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 10.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2200mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 13 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 is a bit better than the Moto X, with a 77 score against 70.9. The LG V20 body is notably newer and incredibly thinner, but extremely heavier than Moto X. LG V20 has a little bit better looking display than Moto X, because it has a larger screen, a way higher display density and a much better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The LG V20 features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto X, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. LG V20 features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto X, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V20 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V20 features a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 2200mAh. LG V20 captures clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto X, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting worse quality videos and photos, it also counts with a much higher 16 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, a lot better video definition and a lot bigger aperture.
The LG V20 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.