Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2015-09-03 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a score of 82.9, which is much better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 74.1 score. Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a bit heavier than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), it's incredibly thinner and way newer. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit superior CPU than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 2 more cores and more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit better display than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px, a quite bigger display and a quite greater count of pixels per inch of display. Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting photographs in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a larger back camera sensor and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a much greater memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 128 GB. Google Pixel 4 XL has better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.