Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting a overall score of 87.6 against 74.1. LG V60 ThinQ is a much newer and incredibly thinner phone than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), but it is heavier. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a bit more vivid screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The LG V60 ThinQ features much more memory for games and applications than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity.
The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) and the LG V60 ThinQ both have really similar cameras, although the LG V60 ThinQ also has a much bigger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited situations and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
LG V60 ThinQ has a much better battery duration than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 67% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.