Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | -- |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 515 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a little bit better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting a 79.2 score against 74.1. Even though Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is somewhat heavier than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), it's much thinner and also incredibly newer. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has lesser processing cores and 13 GB lesser RAM.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a much better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller screen. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way better battery performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better camera than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited environments, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.