Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting a 90.8 score against 74.1. The Galaxy Note 20 body is way newer and extremely thinner than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s, but it is also just a little bit heavier. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and more cores.
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a bit sharper display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better pixel density. The Galaxy Note 20 features a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a lot less mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited situations and a way larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a really longer battery life than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.