Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting a global score of 86.2 against 74.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite design is extremely newer and noticeably thinner, but somewhat heavier than Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note10 Lite has a little bit better hardware performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and 3 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite's camera is just as good as Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s camera, because although the Galaxy Note10 Lite has a smaller back camera sensor capturing worse quality photos, a lot less mega-pixels back facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a much better battery performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 50% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.