Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2015-09-03 | -- |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | -- |
| 6.31 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S24 Ultra has an overall score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s global score of 74.1. Galaxy S24 Ultra's design is notably lighter and thinner than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a really superior processing power than Galaxy S24 Ultra, although it has 5 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores (although faster).
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy S24 Ultra, because although it has a bit worse 1440 x 2560px resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater display pixels density. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra counts with a way better battery lifetime than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 67 percent larger battery capacity. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, although it has a back camera with way less mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.