Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-03 | -- |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | -- |
| 6.31 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s score of 74.1. Samsung Galaxy S25's design is notably thinner and much lighter than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a much powerful CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has lesser processing cores and 5 GB lesser RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a better looking display than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit lower pixel quantity per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy S25 takes much better photographs and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a way better video resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture, a much larger sensor shooting way better quality photographs and videos and a camera with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features slightly more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S25 has greater battery lifetime than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.