Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 6.0, 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-07-28 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is better than the Moto X Style's global score of 73.8. The LG Velvet body is much newer and much thinner than Moto X Style's, but it's also just a little bit heavier. LG Velvet features a superior hardware performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a greater number of cores and 3 GB more RAM.
Motorola Moto X Style has a sharper screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a higher display density. The LG Velvet has a better camera than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the LG Velvet also has a bigger aperture, a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures and a camera in the back with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
LG Velvet features a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Moto X Style, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has a really longer battery life than Moto X Style, because it has a 43 percent larger battery size.
LG Velvet not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.