Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 6.0, 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-07-28 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is a little bit better than the Moto X Style, getting an 80 score against 73.8. Motorola One Zoom's design is much newer and noticeably thinner than Moto X Style's, although it's also just a bit heavier. The Motorola One Zoom has a better performance than Moto X Style, because it has more RAM memory and 7 more cores.
The Motorola Moto X Style features a sharper display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a greater count of pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola One Zoom has a superior camera than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola One Zoom also has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture and a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola One Zoom counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto X Style, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB, the Motorola One Zoom also has 128 GB internal storage. Motorola One Zoom features superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Motorola One Zoom is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.