Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2017-10-19 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is better than the Motorola Moto X4, with a global score of 88.1 against 74.4. Even though iPhone X and the Motorola Moto X4 were only released 1 months apart, iPhone X's body is just a bit heavier but a little bit thinner. The Apple iPhone X has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a little bigger screen, a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a little better number of pixels per inch in the display.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a superior processor than Moto X4, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a 64-bits processor. The iPhone X captures just a bit better videos and photos than Moto X4, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have the same resolution camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the iPhone X also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
The iPhone X features just a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto X4, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Moto X4 has a bit longer battery performance than iPhone X, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto X4. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Moto X4, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.