Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the Motorola Moto X4, with an 87.5 score against 74.4. Google Pixel 4a 5G's construction is notably newer, but a bit thicker and a little heavier than Motorola Moto X4. Moto X4 and Google Pixel 4a 5G have quite similar displays, because although the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bigger display.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 3 GB more RAM. The Moto X4 counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 4a 5G captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto X4, and although they both have a same size sensor and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and videos, a higher 12.2 megapixels resolution camera in the back and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Google Pixel 4a 5G costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto X4, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.