Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2017-10-19 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Moto X4, with a global score of 81.3 against 74.4. LG V35 ThinQ's design is a little lighter and a little bit thinner than the Moto X4, even though both of them were only released 8 months apart. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit sharper display than Moto X4, because it has a larger screen, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a better pixel quantity per inch in the screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a little better processing power than Moto X4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto X4, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more internal memory capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Moto X4, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. LG V35 ThinQ takes a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has a smaller camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments and a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the LG V35 ThinQ is also cheaper than the Motorola Moto X4, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.