Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is slightly better than Moto X4's overall score of 74.4. LG V40 ThinQ's construction is newer and a little thinner, but just a little heavier than Moto X4. LG V40 ThinQ features just a bit better looking screen than Moto X4, because it has a higher number of pixels per inch of screen, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a larger screen.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit faster CPU than Moto X4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. LG V40 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same resolution back facing camera and the same video resolution, the LG V40 ThinQ also counts with better video frame rate and a much bigger camera aperture.
LG V40 ThinQ has a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Moto X4, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 64 GB internal storage. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better battery performance than Moto X4, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
LG V40 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.