Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a general score of 91.2, which is way better than Motorola Moto X4's 74.4 overall score. The LG Wing body is incredibly newer, but heavier and way thicker than Motorola Moto X4. Motorola Moto X4 has a little sharper screen than LG Wing, because although it has a way smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel quantity in each inch in the display.
The LG Wing has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has more internal memory capacity. LG Wing counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Wing also has more RAM.
LG Wing captures much better pictures and videos than Moto X4, and although they both have the same video resolution, the LG Wing also has a much more mega pixels camera in the back, better 60 fps video frame rate, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor and a larger camera aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited environments.
The LG Wing counts with better battery life than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto X4. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy LG Wing, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Moto X4, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.