Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-07-02 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 has a score of 76.1, which is just a bit better than Moto X4's 74.4 global score. The Galaxy A22 is a extremely newer phone than the Moto X4, but it is a little bit thicker and heavier. Motorola Moto X4 counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better display density and a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920.
The Moto X4 features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A22, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Moto X4 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or video in low light environments and a camera in the back with a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 features a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto X4, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto X4 counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.