Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-12-27 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is better than the Motorola Moto X4, having a general score of 85.5 against 74.4. Samsung Galaxy A51's body has the same thickness than the Motorola Moto X4, but it is a little bit heavier. The Galaxy A51 counts with just a little better performance than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A51 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Motorola Moto X4 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixel count per inch in the screen. Galaxy A51 counts with a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Moto X4, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 takes much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a F2 aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a lot bigger sensor shooting much better quality photographs and videos and a much higher resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features better battery life than Motorola Moto X4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 costs a little more money than the Moto X4, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.