Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto X4, getting a global score of 90.8 against 74.4. Although Galaxy A51 5G is much newer than Motorola Moto X4, it is heavier and a little bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a bit superior processor than Moto X4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Motorola Moto X4 counts with a bit better display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much better camera than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same aperture and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a way bigger sensor capturing lot higher quality pictures and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Moto X4, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a very superior battery life than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 50 percent larger battery size.
The Galaxy A51 5G costs more money than the Motorola Moto X4, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.