Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is way better than the Motorola Moto X4, with a 92.9 score against 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a way newer device than the Motorola Moto X4, but it's somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Motorola Moto X4 counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better battery performance than Moto X4, because it has a 50% greater battery capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots much clearer videos and photos than Moto X4, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a back camera with lot more MP, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and videos and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more money than Moto X4, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.