Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-10-19 | 2016-06-01 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C7 is just a bit better than the Moto X4, having a 77.7 score against 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy C7 is an older and a little heavier cellphone than the Moto X4, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat thinner anyway. Motorola Moto X4 counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 1920 resolution, the Motorola Moto X4 also counts with a little bit better pixels density.
Motorola Moto X4 counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy C7, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto X4 features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C7, although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Moto X4 takes slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy C7, because although it has a way worse 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition. The Galaxy C7 has a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 10 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.