Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than Moto X4's overall score of 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is newer and somewhat thinner, but much heavier than the Moto X4. Galaxy Fold features just a bit better hardware performance than Moto X4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory.
Motorola Moto X4 features a little bit better screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a way worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel quantity per inch of screen. The Galaxy Fold captures slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have the same video resolution, a back-facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels and a 0.39 inches camera sensor, the Galaxy Fold also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a much bigger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy Fold has much more storage to store more apps and games than Moto X4, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Fold counts with a much better battery duration than Moto X4, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto X4. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto X4, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.