Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2013-09-25 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than the Moto X4's 74.4 overall score. Even being the best in this review, the Samsung Galaxy Note3 construction is noticeably older, just a bit heavier and just a bit thicker than Moto X4. The Moto X4 counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 1920px, the Moto X4 also counts with a quite better screen pixels density.
The Moto X4 has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto X4 has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola Moto X4 also has 4 more cpu cores.
The Galaxy Note3 features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X4, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Motorola Moto X4 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a camera with lesser mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality and a larger camera aperture to capture better captures in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.