Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is much better than Moto X4, getting an 86.3 score against 74.4. Galaxy S10e's design has the same thickness than the Moto X4, but it is a bit lighter. Samsung Galaxy S10e features a little sharper display than Moto X4, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a quite better 1080 x 2280 resolution and a just a bit higher screen pixels density.
Galaxy S10e has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10e also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10e features just a bit better camera than Moto X4, and although they both have the same sensor size, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy S10e also has a way bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos and better video frame rates.
The Galaxy S10e features more storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has just a bit better battery performance than Moto X4, because it has 3100mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Galaxy S10e costs a lot more than Motorola Moto X4, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.