Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than Motorola Moto X4, getting a overall score of 85.6 against 74.4. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip 3 is somewhat heavier than the Motorola Moto X4, it's somewhat thinner and newer. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit better screen than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a bigger screen and a bit greater pixels density.
Motorola Moto X4 features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit faster processing unit than Moto X4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little longer battery lifetime than Moto X4, because it has a 10% larger battery size. The Motorola Moto X4 shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, they both have a back facing camera with a 12 mega pixels.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto X4. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Moto X4, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.