Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | -- |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a lot better than the Moto X4, having a 91.1 score against 74.4. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a way heavier but thinner cellphone than the Moto X4. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a better screen than Moto X4, because although it has a little worse pixels amount in each display inch, it also counts with a way bigger display and a lot better 1968 x 2184px resolution.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola Moto X4 has a much faster processor than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 13 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a superior battery duration than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a better camera than Moto X4, because it has a larger aperture and a way higher resolution back camera.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto X4. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola Moto X4, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.