Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is better than Moto Z Droid Edition's global score of 75.6. The Galaxy A50 design is much newer, but somewhat heavier and notably thicker than Moto Z Droid Edition. The Moto Z Droid Edition has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixels amount per inch of display.
Galaxy A50 has a bit superior CPU than Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy A50 also has 4 more processing cores. The Moto Z Droid Edition has just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A50, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A50 takes slightly better videos and photos than Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a larger diafragm aperture and a much higher 25 megapixels resolution back camera.
Galaxy A50 counts with a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 54 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.