Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A70 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, having a global score of 76.9 against 75.6. Both devices in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A70 has the previous 10 version while Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat version. The Samsung Galaxy A70 construction is incredibly newer, but thicker and noticeably heavier than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition.
Galaxy A70 has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has 2 GB more RAM and 4 more cpu cores (although slower). The Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Moto Z Droid Edition counts with just a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A70 features a way better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 73% more battery size.
The Moto Z Droid Edition shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.