Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a global score of 81.9, which is a bit better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 score. Even though Google Pixel 4 is thicker than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it's a little lighter and a lot newer. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a just a little higher display pixels density.
The Google Pixel 4 has a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a greater number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z Force Droid Edition features better battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.