Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Sonic silver |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition has an overall score of 76.4, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's general score of 76.2. Despite of the fact that the Moto Z Force Droid Edition is noticeably older than nubia Red Magic 5S, it's construction is notably lighter and a lot thinner. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a bit sharper display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 5S features just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 4 GB more RAM and 4 more cores.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features longer battery performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.