Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Prism bricks black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, having a 92.9 score against 76.4. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit faster processor than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better pixels density. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features greater battery performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much better camera than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.