Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than the Moto Z Force, with an 83.7 score against 75.8. Even though the LG V50 ThinQ is way newer than Moto Z Force, it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. These phones come with Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and also faster). The LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better screen than Moto Z Force, because it has a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a just a bit greater amount of pixels per inch of display and a larger display.
LG V50 ThinQ takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot lower 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos.
LG V50 ThinQ has a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.