Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| -- | Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro has an overall score of 78.3, which is slightly better than Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. Although the vivo X70 Pro is extremely newer than the Moto Z Force, it is heavier and just a little bit thicker. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but vivo X70 Pro has older 11 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Vivo X70 Pro features a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has more CPU cores and 8 GB more RAM. Motorola Moto Z Force has a slightly better looking screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixel density.
The Moto Z Force counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Vivo X70 Pro counts with longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 27 percent bigger battery size.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a greater camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light images and videos, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.