Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-04-24 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Red and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone SE (2020) is much better than Moto Z Play Droid, with an 81.5 score against 71.8. Even though Apple iPhone SE (2020) is just a little thicker than Moto Z Play Droid, it's lighter and also notably newer. The iPhone SE (2020) has a superior hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone SE (2020) also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The iPhone SE (2020) has a slightly better screen than Moto Z Play Droid, although it has a lot lower 750 x 1334 resolution, a little smaller screen and a little less pixels per inch of display. Moto Z Play Droid counts with much more memory to install games and applications than iPhone SE (2020), because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto Z Play Droid features a much longer battery duration than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 3510mAh battery size against 1821mAh. IPhone SE (2020) has just a bit better camera than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a back camera with a way lower resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better photos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.