Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2016-09-08 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, getting a overall score of 82 against 71.8. Apple iPhone XR is a newer device than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, although it is somewhat heavier and thicker. The Apple iPhone XR features a faster processor than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has lesser processing cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The iPhone XR has a little sharper display than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a quite lower number of pixels per inch in the screen and a quite lower resolution of 828 x 1792px, it also counts with a little larger display. Motorola Moto Z Play Droid features a superior memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto Z Play Droid counts with a bit superior battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has a 3510mAh battery size. IPhone XR captures a bit better videos and photos than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back camera with lot less MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.