Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2016-09-08 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid's 71.8 score. Google Pixel 3's construction is extremely newer and somewhat lighter, but also just a little bit thicker than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit more powerful CPU than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 has a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have a same size display, the Google Pixel 3 also has a little bit greater number of pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px. Moto Z Play Droid has a much greater memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 3 shoots a bit better videos and photos than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a worse video resolution and a lot lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited situations. Moto Z Play Droid counts with superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3510mAh battery size against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.