Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2016-09-08 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is much better than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, having a score of 81.9 against 71.8. The Google Pixel 4 design is a lot newer and a little bit lighter, but somewhat thicker than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid. The Google Pixel 4 has a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 features a little more vivid display than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a bit bigger screen, a little more pixels per display inch and a slightly better 1080 x 2280 resolution. The Motorola Moto Z Play Droid has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z Play Droid features improved battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3510mAh battery capacity. Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better camera than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a back camera with way less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.