Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Just black |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is better than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, with an 82.9 score against 71.8. Even though the Google Pixel 4a is somewhat thicker than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, it's somewhat lighter and also newer. The Google Pixel 4a has a little faster CPU than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4a features a slightly better looking display than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a quite bigger screen and a quite higher screen density. Google Pixel 4a shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot less megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
Moto Z Play Droid features a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z Play Droid has just a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3510mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.