Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the Moto Z Play Droid, getting a score of 87.5 against 71.8. Although the Google Pixel 4a 5G is way newer than the Moto Z Play Droid, it is just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. Google Pixel 4a 5G features just a bit better looking display than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a little better display density, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite bigger screen.
Moto Z Play Droid features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better processor than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity against 3510mAh. Google Pixel 4a 5G captures a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a camera in the back with a much lower resolution and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.