Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has an overall score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than Moto Z Play Droid's 71.8 global score. The HTC One M9 design is just a little lighter than Moto Z Play Droid, but it is incredibly thicker and was released only 19 months before. The HTC One M9 has a much better looking screen than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, the HTC One M9 also counts with a bit better screen density.
Moto Z Play Droid features a much bigger memory for apps and games than HTC One M9, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Moto Z Play Droid also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The HTC One M9 counts with a bit superior processor than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also has an extra graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processor.
Moto Z Play Droid counts with longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 24 percent larger battery size. The HTC One M9 features a slightly better camera than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the HTC One M9 also counts with a more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.