Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A41 has a general score of 81.7, which is better than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid's 71.8 score. Galaxy A41's design is a lot newer and just a bit lighter, but also just a bit thicker than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid. Galaxy A41 features a little bit better display than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a little bigger screen, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite better display density.
The Galaxy A41's processor is very similar to the Moto Z Play Droid one, and although the Galaxy A41 has 1 GB more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Moto Z Play Droid has a bit more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A41, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A41 has a battery duration that's just as good as the battery duration in Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, although the Galaxy A41 has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3510mAh. Samsung Galaxy A41 has a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also has a much higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.