Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-09-08 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is better than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, with an 83.8 score against 71.8. The Galaxy A50 is a extremely newer device than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, although it is just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit more vivid display than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a larger display, a bit higher pixel density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A50 features a bit better processor than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50 also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A50 shoots a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A50 also has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures.
The Galaxy A50 has just a little better battery life than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.